Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › KS-01 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, KS-01
Has not served in Congress
2 priorities from laurenforkansas.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Rural hospitals are the life blood of our communities, and losing them means losing the safety and stability every family depends on.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · laurenforkansas.com/priorities
Heading as listed on laurenforkansas.com ↗ (opens laurenforkansas.com at this heading)
Agriculture is the cornerstone of Western Kansas, and our farm families deserve a system that prioritizes producers, family operations and support the small businesses that line our main streets over corporate monopolies
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · laurenforkansas.com/priorities
Heading as listed on laurenforkansas.com ↗ (opens laurenforkansas.com at this heading)
Kansans deserve a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. Just as the founders intended.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · laurenforkansas.com/priorities
Heading as listed on laurenforkansas.com ↗ (opens laurenforkansas.com at this heading)
It’s time for common-sense immigration reform that secures our borders while providing a fair path to citizenship for those already contributing to our communities. By fixing backlogged courts and stabilizing our agricultural workforce, we can replace a broken system with one that prioritizes humane enforcement and the dignity of every family.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · laurenforkansas.com/priorities
Heading as listed on laurenforkansas.com ↗ (opens laurenforkansas.com at this heading)
Social Security is a hard-earned promise, not a handout, and it's time to stop letting underfunding and political interference delay the benefits you paid for.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · laurenforkansas.com/priorities
Heading as listed on laurenforkansas.com ↗ (opens laurenforkansas.com at this heading)
Heading as listed on laurenforkansas.com ↗ (opens laurenforkansas.com at this heading)
An economy truly prospers when it stops favoring corporate monopolies and starts honoring the dignity of a hard day's work.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · laurenforkansas.com/priorities
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00932855
76¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 5 reports ($103.4K of $136.4K). Cash on hand went from $8.7K on Mar 31, 2026 to $33K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $24,411 | $15,736 | $8,675 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $16,240 | $21,754 | $3,162 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 15, 2026 | $7,610 | $5,988 | $4,784 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $75,331 | $45,317 | $34,798 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $12,759 | $14,572 | $32,985 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
12 endorsers listed on Lauren Reinhold’s own campaign site: 1 official, 4 unions, 4 organizations, 3 people.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
U.S. Representative, Kansas District 3
Former EPA Regional Administrator, State Department Principal Deputy Legal Advisor, and Great Bend High School Hall of Fame Inductee
Josh Gilmore & Brandon Neville
Co-Founders and Former Executive Leaders of the Smoky Hill Equality Coalition
Advanced · 24,660 votes (64%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Lost · 97,212 votes (42%) · 2 of 3 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 117 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $40.1K.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
The largest of the committees is listed. In all, 1 committee contribution was filed this cycle, totaling $1K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $136,351
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
58% of the money placed by state came from inside Kansas: $23.2K of $40.1K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 88 contributions · 58% | $23,178 |
| 4 contributions · 20% | $8,000 |
| 20 contributions · 16% | $6,550 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% | $1,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.5% | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.6% | $250 |
| 1 contribution · 0.2% | $100 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 7 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 69 contributions · 58% of ranked | $23,326 |
| Written instead of an employer · 11 contributions · 14% of ranked | $5,600 |
| 5 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $1,475 |
| 4 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $1,150 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 3 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $850 |
| 2 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $750 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($37,038) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
No outside spending filed
The campaign also refunded $106 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $87,713
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 335 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 22 payments · 8.1% of all spending | $8,359 |
| 10 payments · 6.8% of all spending | $7,065 |
| 5 payments · 6.2% of all spending | $6,396 |
| 10 payments · 6% of all spending | $6,200 |
| 4 payments · 5.3% of all spending | $5,500 |
| 16 payments · 5% of all spending | $5,196 |
| 10 payments · 4.5% of all spending | $4,666 |
| 9 payments · 4.2% of all spending | $4,360 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 47 contributions · 43% of ranked | $17,136 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 22 contributions · 15% of ranked | $6,190 |
| 5 contributions · 8.1% of ranked | $3,250 |
| 5 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $1,475 |
| 3 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $1,050 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked | $1,000 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($37,038) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.