Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › GA-10 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, GA-10
Has not served in Congress
3 priorities from votepamdelancy.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Healthcare should be accessible and affordable for all families. I will work to protect and expand access to quality healthcare across Georgia’s 10th District, ensuring that families, seniors, and veterans are not left without coverage. My focus is on policies that support both mental and physical well-being, because strong communities begin with healthy people. I will address the threat of veterans earned healthcare benefits being diminished or abolished. I will address the need for more robust mental health policies with an increased focus on the needs of veterans, youth, senior citizens and individual residents in underserved areas.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · votepamdelancy.com/issues
The rising cost of housing and food continues to place a heavy burden on working families and underserved communities. Too many people are spending a growing share of their income just to meet basic needs like food and shelter. I will support policies that provide real economic relief for the people of Georgia’s 10th District and help families afford the essentials they need to live and thrive. Clean water is essential to human life and to the health of our communities. We must protect this vital resource. The rapid expansion of data centers in Georgia cannot come at the expense of our water supply, our environment, or the health of our residents. Economic development should never compromise public health, and we must demand responsible, sustainable growth that puts people first.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · votepamdelancy.com/issues
Heading as listed on votepamdelancy.com/issues ↗ (opens votepamdelancy.com/issues at this heading)
Heading as listed on votepamdelancy.com/issues ↗ (opens votepamdelancy.com/issues at this heading)
Our community has experienced the tragic loss of life due to gaps in safety, and that reality cannot be ignored. Every resident deserves to feel safe—whether they are spending time in their neighborhood, attending school, or pursuing their education. I am committed to working collaboratively with community leaders, educators, law enforcement, and local organizations who share the goal of creating safe, supportive environments. Public safety is about prevention, accountability, and partnership, and together we can build communities where everyone feels secure and protected.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · votepamdelancy.com/issues
Heading as listed on votepamdelancy.com/issues ↗ (opens votepamdelancy.com/issues at this heading)
We need a secure border and a functional immigration system with legal policies and procedures that eliminates cruelty, inhumane and sometimes murder of citizens facing apprehension by security personnel. An oversight committee is needed to train and review that processes and procedures are aligned with the judicial law system. We can enforce the law and eliminate chaos in the systems but mandating accountability and transparency for the safety and security of all citizens. I support comprehensive reform that strengthens border security, repair the asylum process, and create a clear, legal pathway for work and maintain family unity. We can and must build an immigration system that is secure, lawful, and rooted in American values.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · votepamdelancy.com/issues
Heading as listed on votepamdelancy.com/issues ↗ (opens votepamdelancy.com/issues at this heading)
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00933283
56¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 5 reports ($44.4K of $78.7K). Cash on hand went from $3.9K on Mar 31, 2026 to $24.3K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $8,375 | $4,510 | $3,865 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 29, 2026 | $5,000 | $5,112 | $7,205 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $9,705 | $1,500 | $8,705 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $53,974 | $30,481 | $58,493 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $1,616 | $2,819 | $24,292 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No endorsers named
Advanced · 35,003 votes (54%) · 1 of 3 · Full results ↗
Lost · 0 votes (0%) · 2 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 17 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $13.2K.
Total reported receipts $78,670
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
50% of the money placed by state came from inside Georgia: $6.7K of $13.2K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 11 contributions · 50% | $6,665 |
| 3 contributions · 32% | $4,250 |
| 1 contribution · 7.6% | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 6.1% | $800 |
| 1 contribution · 3.8% | $500 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 5 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 60% of ranked | $3,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 24% of ranked | $1,215 |
| 1 contribution · 16% of ranked | $800 |
A further $8,200 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($9,418) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 5 contributions · 55% of ranked | $3,750 |
| 2 contributions · 19% of ranked | $1,300 |
| 2 contributions · 11% of ranked | $750 |
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Total itemized disbursements $13,940
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 17 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 6.8% of all spending | $3,000 |
| 1 payment · 3.4% of all spending | $1,500 |
| 2 payments · 3.1% of all spending | $1,373 |
| 1 payment · 2.7% of all spending | $1,212 |
| 1 payment · 2.7% of all spending | $1,212 |
| 1 payment · 2.3% of all spending | $1,000 |
| 2 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $1,000 |
| 1 payment · 1.7% of all spending | $750 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Written instead of an occupation · 1 contribution · 7.4% of ranked |
| $500 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1 contribution · 7.4% of ranked | $500 |
A further $6,415 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, None), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($9,418) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.