Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › FL-11 race › 2025–2026
RepublicanU.S. House, FL-11Florida
Has not served in Congress
9 priorities from razackforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Dr. Nizam Razack believes America’s healthcare system must return to common sense: lower costs, greater transparency, stronger competition, patient freedom, and less government bureaucracy standing between doctors and patients.
As a board-certified neurosurgeon, attorney, educator, and healthcare leader, Dr. Razack has spent decades inside the medical system. He has seen firsthand how waste, corruption, bureaucracy, and corporate interference have driven healthcare costs through the roof while reducing patient access and quality of care.
Healthcare should serve patients not insurance companies, pharmaceutical monopolies, or unelected bureaucrats.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · razackforcongress.com/issues
Dr. Nizam Razack believes medical decisions belong between patients and their physicians not government bureaucrats, pharmaceutical lobbyists, corporate pressure campaigns, or politically driven mandates.
Americans deserve transparency, informed consent, scientific integrity, and the freedom to make personal healthcare decisions without coercion, censorship, discrimination, or threats to their jobs, education, or military service.
Public trust in healthcare cannot be rebuilt through fear, intimidation, or censorship. It can only be restored through accountability, transparency, honest investigation, and open scientific debate.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · razackforcongress.com/issues
Dr. Nizam Razack believes homes should belong to American families not Wall Street hedge funds, foreign- backed corporations, or billion-dollar investment firms turning neighborhoods into corporate profit centers.
Across America, institutional investors have been buying up thousands of single-family homes, driving up prices, inflating rents, shrinking inventory, and locking hardworking Americans out of the dream of homeownership.
The American Dream was built on homeownership, strong neighborhoods, and stable families not corporate monopolies treating homes like stock portfolios.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · razackforcongress.com/issues
Dr. Nizam Razack supports President Trump’s strong, commonsense election reforms designed to protect every lawful American vote, restore public confidence, and ensure elections are secure, transparent,
auditable, and free from fraud, corruption, or foreign interference.
Americans should never have to question whether elections are honest, accurate, and fairly administered.
Election integrity is the foundation of constitutional government and public trust.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · razackforcongress.com/issues
Dr. Nizam Razack supports President Donald Trump’s Artificial Intelligence agenda while also supporting strong, commonsense safeguards that protect children, defend parental rights, preserve privacy, strengthen national security, and uphold American family values.
America should lead the world in Artificial Intelligence innovation but never at the expense of our children’s safety, mental health, privacy, morality, or future.
Big Tech companies should never be allowed to exploit children, manipulate families, harvest private data, censor Americans, replace parental authority, or hide behind secret algorithms without accountability. Technology should serve families not replace them, control them, divide them, indoctrinate them, or undermine
them.
Dr. Razack believes America can dominate the future of AI while still defending constitutional freedoms, parental authority, free speech, human dignity, and the moral foundations that keep families, communities, and the nation strong.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · razackforcongress.com/issues
Dr. Nizam Razack believes public office is a public trust not a tool for personal enrichment.
Members of Congress should never profit from insider knowledge, classified briefings, legislative influence, or political connections while hardworking Americans struggle with inflation, rising costs, and economic uncertainty.
The American people deserve to know their elected officials are serving the country not gaming the stock market behind closed doors.
If politicians consistently outperform Wall Street using privileged government access, the system is broken.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · razackforcongress.com/issues
Dr. Razack believes America’s exploding national debt is a direct threat to our economic stability, national security, and the future of our children and grandchildren. Washington cannot continue spending money it does not have while burdening future generations with unsustainable debt, inflation, and weakened economic growth.
Fiscal responsibility begins with eliminating waste, fraud, abuse, corruption, and reckless spending at every level of government portfolios.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · razackforcongress.com/issues
Dr. Razack believes the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land and must remain the sole foundation of American governance, civil liberties, and judicial authority.
America is a constitutional republic governed by the rule of law not by foreign legal systems, international ideological movements, or unelected outside influences. Every elected official takes an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, and that oath must be taken seriously.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · razackforcongress.com/issues
FEC filings, Apr 1, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00949834
90¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 3 reports ($863.1K of $956.1K). Cash on hand went from $62.5K on Jun 30, 2026 to $93K on Sep 30, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $676,652 | $614,172 | $62,480 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 29, 2026 | $255,900 | $154,392 | $163,988 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $23,590 | $94,531 | $93,048 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Sep 30, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
4 endorsers listed on Nizam Razack’s own campaign site: 2 officials, 2 people.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Not yet called · 100% reporting · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 140 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $202.1K.
The 2 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 2 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $5K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $956,142
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
98% of the money placed by state came from inside Florida: $198.1K of $202.1K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 135 contributions · 98% | $198,100 |
| 2 contributions · 0.7% | $1,500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.5% | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.5% | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.2% | $500 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 5 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 13 contributions · 14% of ranked | $27,500 |
| Written instead of an employer · 18 contributions · 11% of ranked | $21,600 |
| 5 contributions · 6.6% of ranked | $13,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 3 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $5,250 |
| 2 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $5,000 |
A further $5,100 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,872) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $2,500 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $862,816
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 133 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
7 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $13,455 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 7 payments · 17% of all spending | $145,726 |
| 2 payments · 14% of all spending | $123,073 |
| 1 payment · 10% of all spending | $89,000 |
| 1 payment · 10% of all spending | $88,650 |
| 2 payments · 7.2% of all spending | $61,850 |
| 4 payments · 6.5% of all spending | $56,052 |
| 1 payment · 5.2% of all spending | $45,075 |
| 7 payments · 5.2% of all spending | $44,841 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 48 contributions · 33% of ranked | $65,800 |
| 15 contributions · 16% of ranked | $32,500 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 24 contributions · 12% of ranked | $24,450 |
| 3 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $8,500 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 3 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $7,250 |
| 2 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 4 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $5,000 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,872) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.