Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › FL-03 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, FL-03
Has not served in Congress
13 priorities from sethharpforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Protect and strengthen Social Security by raising the payroll tax cap to $250,000, helping secure benefits for future generations without reducing payments for retirees.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sethharpforcongress.com/issues
Guarantee affordable health care for every American and ensure that no family is forced into bankruptcy because they got sick.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sethharpforcongress.com/issues
Pass the C.U.B.S Act (Childhood, Unity, Break, Stipend) ↗ (opens sethharpforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Expand affordable child care through a sliding-scale subsidy that helps working families manage one of their largest monthly expenses.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sethharpforcongress.com/issues
Pass the H.E.A.R.T. Act (Housing Equity & Affordable Residential Titles) ↗ (opens sethharpforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
The American Dream starts with homeownership. Large corporations and investment firms now own hundreds of thousands of single-family homes nationwide, driving up prices and reducing inventory for working families. The H.E.A.R.T. Act imposes escalating taxes on large-scale corporate home acquisitions while creating incentives for builders to construct affordable housing for first-time buyers and middle-class families.
This proposal targets Wall Street—not small landlords. Homes should be places where families live, not simply assets traded by corporations.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sethharpforcongress.com/issues
The D.O. Initiative (Dependable, Objective) ↗ (opens sethharpforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Mental health care is one of America's most overlooked crises. Nearly one in five adults experiences mental health challenges annually, while millions of Americans wait months to see a counselor or therapist. The D.O. Initiative will double America's behavioral health workforce over the next decade through tuition assistance, scholarships, and workforce grants. Our goal is simple: reduce wait times from months to days and ensure that help is available when people need it most. Mental health is health care.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sethharpforcongress.com/issues
Passing the S.L.I.C.E. Act (Student Loan Ideal Calculation Evaluation) ↗ (opens sethharpforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Student debt has become a major obstacle to economic mobility. Millions of Americans delay buying homes, starting families, opening businesses, or saving for retirement because of crushing loan payments. The S.L.I.C.E. Act caps federal student loan interest rates at 3.1% and limits repayment obligations to a manageable percentage of income. Education should create opportunity and not decades of financial suffocation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sethharpforcongress.com/issues
CEO Salary Cap ↗ (opens sethharpforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Since 1978, CEO compensation has increased nearly 1,500%. Worker pay has not. In the 1970s, the average CEO earned roughly 26 times what a typical worker earned. Today, many CEOs earn nearly 300 times more than the employees who help create that success. Under this proposal, executive compensation would be capped at 150 times the median employee salary. If executives want larger compensation packages, they can earn them the same way everyone else does: by helping their workers succeed. A stronger middle class begins with fairer rewards for work.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sethharpforcongress.com/issues
Passing the the F.A.I.R. Plan (Functional Accessibility Internet Resource) ↗ (opens sethharpforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
The internet is no longer a luxury.
Students need it for homework. Businesses need it to compete. Workers need it to earn a living.
The F.A.I.R. Plan treats broadband access as critical infrastructure and establishes a pathway toward affordable nationwide internet service with a target cost of $10 per month.
Just as previous generations built highways, bridges, and rural electrification, our generation must build universal digital access.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sethharpforcongress.com/issues
Fiscal responsibility should not be partisan.
During President Reagan's second term, the corporate tax rate stood at 26%.
Reagan Redux restores the corporate tax rate to that level, generating hundreds of billions in revenue that can be invested in Social Security, education, health care, veterans services, and programs that strengthen working families.
If 26% worked under Reagan, it can work today.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sethharpforcongress.com/issues
Passing the M.A.K.E. Act (Military Access to Key Enamel) ↗ (opens sethharpforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
America's veterans fulfilled their obligation to our nation. We must fulfill ours to them.
The M.A.K.E. Act provides comprehensive dental coverage through the VA system, recognizing that oral health problems are often linked to heart disease, diabetes, stroke, and other serious medical conditions. Too many veterans delay dental treatment because of cost.
Preventative care saves money, improves quality of life, and honors those who served.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sethharpforcongress.com/issues
Implementing the Triple E Program (Ending Exceptions for Elitism) ↗ (opens sethharpforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Too often, wealthy executives use stock compensation and special tax provisions to pay lower effective tax rates than working Americans.
The Triple E Program closes these loopholes by taxing large stock awards when received, requiring executives to take taxable salaries alongside stock compensation, and creating a fair taxation structure for high-value compensation packages.
The tax code should reward work and not privilege.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sethharpforcongress.com/issues
Implementing the F.U.E.L. Initiative (Feeding Universal Education Lunches) ↗ (opens sethharpforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
No child should struggle to learn because they are hungry.
More than 50 million children attend public schools in America, and for many of them, school meals are their most reliable source of daily nutrition.
The F.U.E.L. Initiative provides universal school lunch for every public-school student in America.
For families, it lowers costs. For students, it improves concentration and academic performance. For America, it is an investment in our future.
Hungry children cannot focus on learning.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sethharpforcongress.com/issues
FEC filings, Apr 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00903013
74¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 8 reports ($128.3K of $172.4K). Cash on hand went from $869 on Jun 30, 2025 to $44.1K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $3,006 | $2,137 | $869 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $4,451 | $4,038 | $1,282 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $4,800 | $4,277 | $1,805 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $10,167 | $8,945 | $3,028 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $9,770 | $10,477 | $2,322 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 29, 2026 | $5,599 | $4,910 | $3,011 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $98,674 | $55,873 | $45,811 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $35,967 | $37,632 | $44,145 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No endorsements page
Not yet called · 95% reporting · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 93 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $20.8K.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $172,435
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
97% of the money placed by state came from inside Florida: $20.2K of $20.8K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 85 contributions · 97% | $20,220 |
| 8 contributions · 2.9% | $600 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 2 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 38 contributions · 45% of ranked | $9,190 |
| 2 contributions · 20% of ranked | $4,000 |
| 2 contributions · 9.8% of ranked | $2,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 2 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $750 |
| 7 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $700 |
| 5 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $695 |
| Written instead of an employer · 2 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $550 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked | $500 |
A further $500 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($111,263) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 38 contributions · 45% of ranked | $9,190 |
| 4 contributions · 30% of ranked | $6,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $750 |
| 7 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $700 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 5 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $700 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked | $500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.1% of ranked | $420 |
| 4 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $275 |
A further $500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($111,263) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $2 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $68,732
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 212 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 payments · 14% of all spending | $18,438 |
| 11 payments · 13% of all spending | $16,912 |
| 1 payment · 10% of all spending | $13,100 |
| 4 payments · 3.9% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 81 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $1,962 |
| 9 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $1,738 |
| 49 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $1,691 |
| 1 payment · 1.1% of all spending | $1,400 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.