Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CA-44 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, CA-44
Has not served in Congress
4 priorities from angelforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Affordability is essential because it determines basic quality of life, financial stability, and access to necessities like housing, food and healthcare. When essentials are affordable, it reduces poverty, improves public health, and fosters economic growth, whereas high costs strain households and limit economic mobility.
The median property value in California's 44th Congressional District is approximately $694,200, with the median sale price recently reported at $713,000 as of February 2026.
As of February 2026, the Los Angeles area experienced a 2.9% headline inflation rate. Food prices rose 3.1%, while energy prices increased 0.2%. Over five years, California grocery costs have risen 26%, and gasoline excise taxes are expected to increase further, compounding the pressure on families.
Genevieve's focus:
Lower the cost of living
Support working families
Expand economic opportunity
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angelforcongress.com/priorities
California's 44th Congressional District, which includes areas of Los Angeles County such as Carson, Compton, Lynwood, North Long Beach, and San Pedro, is located within a region that has faced significant public safety challenges. Public safety is primarily impacted by violent crime and property crime, which have shown significant shifts.
Crime Breakdown ↗ (opens angelforcongress.com/priorities at this heading)
Violent CrimeHomicide rates decreased 10.4% in 2024 statewide but remain higher than 2019. Aggravated assault rates 23.1% higher than 2019.
Property CrimeDominated by larceny theft (65%), burglaries (15%), and auto thefts (20%). Auto theft remains 19.3% higher than 2019.
ShopliftingRising 14.2% in 2024 and 48% higher than 2019 — a significant public safety concern.
ArsonIncreased 9.9% in 2024, marking a notable upturn.
Genevieve's focus:
Strengthen community safety
Support accountability and effective enforcement
Address rising crime trends
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angelforcongress.com/priorities
The rising costs present several critical risks to the district's public health landscape.
District 44 residents at risk of losing health coverage
CA enrollees may be forced to drop plans
Californians can't afford necessities due to medical bills
Loss of Coverage ↗ (opens angelforcongress.com/priorities at this heading)
Estimates suggest 47,222 residents in District 44 could lose health coverage entirely due to federal funding cuts and premium spikes. Statewide, approximately 1 in 3 enrollees may be forced to drop their plans.
Reduced Access to Care ↗ (opens angelforcongress.com/priorities at this heading)
Increased out-of-pocket costs often lead individuals to delay or forgo necessary medical services, including prescription drugs and behavioral health care.
Disproportionate Effects on Communities of Color ↗ (opens angelforcongress.com/priorities at this heading)
Premium increases without subsidies are projected to hit minority communities hardest, with premiums for Latino, Asian/Pacific Islander, and Black Californians expected to rise by 106% to 122%.
Financial & Health Insecurity ↗ (opens angelforcongress.com/priorities at this heading)
Roughly 1 million Californians already report being unable to afford basic necessities due to medical bills. Further increases threaten to push more households into poverty.
Genevieve's focus:
Lower out-of-pocket costs
Expand access to care
Improve system efficiency
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angelforcongress.com/priorities
Approximately 84.7% are U.S. citizens, meaning over 15% of the population consists of non-citizens, including legal permanent residents and undocumented individuals. Nearly 60% of households speak a non-English language at home, with Spanish being the most common (48.5%).
Genevieve's focus:
Secure borders
Fair legal pathways
Policies that work in the real world
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · angelforcongress.com/priorities
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00942029
50¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 5 reports ($10.9K of $21.8K). Cash on hand went from $7.8K on Mar 31, 2026 to $10.9K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $10,301 | $2,537 | $7,764 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $2,511 | $1,783 | $8,492 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $1,086 | $832 | $8,746 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $7,824 | $5,481 | $11,089 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $104 | $249 | $10,944 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No endorsements page
Not yet called · 100% reporting · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 33 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $14.9K.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $21,826
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
83% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $12.3K of $14.9K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 29 contributions · 83% | $12,301 |
| 1 contribution · 6.7% | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.5% | $520 |
| 1 contribution · 3.5% | $520 |
| 1 contribution · 3.5% | $520 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 5 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 17 contributions · 54% of ranked | $7,965 |
| 2 contributions · 13% of ranked | $2,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 3 contributions · 10% of ranked | $1,540 |
| 2 contributions · 8.7% of ranked | $1,290 |
| 1 contribution · 3.4% of ranked | $500 |
| 1 contribution · 1.7% of ranked | $260 |
| 1 contribution · 1.7% of ranked | $260 |
| 1 contribution · 1.7% of ranked | $250 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,858) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Total itemized disbursements $9,782
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 27 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 30% of all spending | $3,220 |
| 11 payments · 12% of all spending | $1,350 |
| 1 payment · 9.2% of all spending | $1,000 |
| 1 payment · 9.2% of all spending | $1,000 |
| 1 payment · 7.2% of all spending | $780 |
| 2 payments · 6.1% of all spending | $659 |
| 4 payments · 5.7% of all spending | $619 |
| 1 payment · 2.4% of all spending | $265 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 9 contributions · 34% of ranked | $5,095 |
| 3 contributions · 14% of ranked | $2,010 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 3 contributions · 10% of ranked | $1,540 |
| 2 contributions · 8.7% of ranked | $1,290 |
| 1 contribution · 6.7% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 3 contributions · 5.7% of ranked | $850 |
| 1 contribution · 3.5% of ranked | $520 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 2 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $500 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,858) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.