Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CA-42 race › 2025–2026
RepublicanU.S. House, CA-42California
Has not served in Congress
No campaign site or public profiles are attached to this record yet.
Noah Von Blom’s words are not shown
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2026 to Sep 2, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00937516
$1.00 has been spent for every dollar raised across 4 reports ($162.6K of $162.6K). Cash on hand went from $94.9K on Mar 31, 2026 to $0 on Sep 2, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $100,597 | $5,683 | $94,914 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $35,840 | $62,672 | $68,082 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $26,201 | $88,740 | $5,543 |
| TERMINATION REPORT 2026 through Sep 2, 2026 | $0 | $5,543 | $0 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 136 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $174.7K.
Total reported receipts $162,638
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Sep 2, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
98% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $171K of $174.7K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 132 contributions · 98% | $170,997 |
| 2 contributions · 1.7% | $3,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.3% | $500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.1% | $250 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 4 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $13,000 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 5 payments · 58% of all spending | $94,679 |
| 2 payments · 10% of all spending | $16,590 |
| 7 payments · 7.4% of all spending | $12,006 |
| 2 payments · 6.1% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 6 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $5,542 |
| 1 payment · 2.2% of all spending | $3,616 |
| 1 payment · 1.8% of all spending | $2,860 |
| 1 payment · 0.4% of all spending | $625 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Not read yet
Lost · 34,124 votes (17%) · 3 of 5 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 24 contributions · 21% of ranked | $31,500 |
| 2 contributions · 4.8% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4.8% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4.8% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.4% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.4% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 2 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.4% of ranked | $3,500 |
A further $27,500 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($891) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 24 contributions · 19% of ranked | $31,500 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 8 contributions · 8.7% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 16 contributions · 8.7% of ranked | $13,997 |
| 7 contributions · 6% of ranked | $9,750 |
| 2 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $6,000 |
| 7 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $6,000 |
A further $13,000 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($891) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $145,938
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 2, 2026.
All 29 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.