Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CA-36 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, CA-36
Has not served in Congress
3 priorities from voteforhouston.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Imagine a fair immigration system where Native-born citizens get the first shot at jobs and opportunities, a government that works for them. A legal immigration system that is fair for everyone, no back door deals or secret amnesty that allows people to skip the line ahead of those who do it right. Strong vetting to prevent and remove criminals that threaten our families. Keeping Americans safe means strong borders and thorough vetting; preserving this American experiment our forefathers enjoyed as we pass these opportunities to our children and their children's children.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · voteforhouston.com/solutions
It’s time for a solution that empowers individuals and families to make the health choices they want to, not what they're forced to barely afford. We have built tremendous capabilities and America has always been the innovative and driving force of healthy living in the world. We’ll do it again by building a system that works for everyone.
We must trust the American people to do the right thing and move away from this top-down model where choices are dictated by a limited few. Start locally first, through the tremendous work of our local institutions, which are already on the front lines, by empowering them and giving them the support they need to provide tailored services based on localized needs. Give people thousands of choices instead of focusing on limiting the cost of the handful of choices you have today. Give people the ability to select the providers based on their needs and individual performance.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · voteforhouston.com/solutions
We are in an age of great possibilities. I want an Abundance of Opportunity for every American. We start by stopping waste, fraud, and abuse in government spending, so we can use that money to help people who need it most. Cut back on the rules and regulations the president implements on a whim and control the overreach with the REIGNS Act. This will let the inventors and businesses grow without heavy burdens, which creates jobs and growth for all. We must reward and support young people for daring to dream, with more job training programs, fixing the student loan crisis, and tax breaks for buying homes or starting companies, so the next generation can reach the American Dream with smart ideas and fair chances.
It's time to dream big by unleashing the free marketplace of ideas and innovation. We won't stop at providing mere relief, we will use growth and creativity to provide abundance for all Americans. Cut out bureaucracies that slow aid and drive up costs. Empower Americans with bold incentives. Help the next generation attain and build wealth through competition, creativity, and opportunity.
We’ll say yes to any sane idea that drives growth, and the free market which empowers people to dream big. I want trillions of private investment dollars here in the South Bay. There is no partisan monopoly on great ideas.
It's time to trust the American people, don't you agree?
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · voteforhouston.com/solutions
FEC filings, Nov 14, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00925842
83¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 3 reports ($5.8K of $7K). Cash on hand went from $537 on Jun 30, 2026 to $1.2K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $5,386 | $4,848 | $537 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $1,097 | $722 | $912 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $538 | $231 | $1,219 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 10 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 14 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $5.7K.
No endorsements page
Not yet called · 100% reporting · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
Total reported receipts $7,020
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
99% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $5.6K of $5.7K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 13 contributions · 99% | $5,617 |
| 1 contribution · 1.2% | $70 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 2 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 3 contributions · 26% of ranked | $1,468 |
| 3 contributions · 25% of ranked | $1,400 |
| 1 contribution · 18% of ranked | $1,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 3 contributions · 13% of ranked | $760 |
| 1 contribution · 9.2% of ranked | $521 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 4.6% of ranked | $260 |
| 1 contribution · 3.7% of ranked | $208 |
| 1 contribution · 1.2% of ranked | $70 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,330) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 contributions · 25% of ranked | $1,400 |
| 2 contributions · 22% of ranked | $1,260 |
| 1 contribution · 18% of ranked | $1,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 3 contributions · 13% of ranked | $760 |
| 1 contribution · 9.2% of ranked | $521 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1 contribution · 4.6% of ranked | $260 |
| 1 contribution · 3.7% of ranked | $208 |
| 1 contribution · 3.7% of ranked | $208 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,330) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Total itemized disbursements $5,562
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 20 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
6 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $1,173 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 10 payments · 52% of all spending | $3,015 |
| 9 payments · 35% of all spending | $2,047 |
| 1 payment · 8.6% of all spending | $500 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.