Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CA-20 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, CA-20
Has not served in Congress
3 priorities from electsandravanscotter.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
You shouldn't have to wonder if your Congressperson knows you exist. Representation is not a privilege — but the job.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · electsandravanscotter.com
Sandra's first promise is simple: she will show up.
Regular Town Halls in every part of the district. Personal responses to constituent correspondence. An office that actually picks up the phone. A representative who reads your letters and answers them — not one who ignores them.
This shouldn't be extraordinary. But in CA-20, it would be.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · electsandravanscotter.com/issues
Heading as listed on electsandravanscotter.com ↗ (opens electsandravanscotter.com at this heading)
Healthcare is a right. Let's make it one.
The system is already there. Medicare has the infrastructure. What it lacks is the political will.
Sandra supports Medicare for All — not as a talking point, but as a lived conviction from twenty years in healthcare settings watching patients get denied, delayed, and bankrupted. She supports amending the Constitution to make Medicare a right, removing healthcare from the battlefield of partisan politics once and for all.
And right now — before that fight is won — Sandra is committed to protecting what exists. The cuts in H.R. 1 will devastate Medi-Cal recipients, people with disabilities, seniors, and working families in CA-20. Sandra knows how to help people navigate those cuts legally and practically, and she will work in Congress to reverse them.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · electsandravanscotter.com/issues
Every person deserves dignity, access, and a seat at the table.
Sandra works with people with disabilities every single day. She has watched the systems meant to support them be chronically underfunded, complicated to navigate, and treated as an afterthought by the people making decisions in Washington.
She has served on the Self-Determination Program Local Advisory Committee for Kern Regional Center. She knows what works and what fails. And she will bring that knowledge to Congress.
Sandra's son uses California's Regional Center system. This isn't abstract policy — it's her family.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · electsandravanscotter.com/issues
Our veterans kept their promise. Congress must keep ours.
CA-20 is home to China Lake Naval Air Weapons Station — one of the most strategically important military installations in the country. And yet for years, our district has had zero real representation fighting for the veterans and military families who call this region home.
Vince Fong's own congressional website doesn't include a link to the VA.
Sandra will hold Town Halls specifically for veterans and military families. She will make sure every veteran in CA-20 knows what they're entitled to, how to navigate the system, and has a direct line to her office.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · electsandravanscotter.com/issues
CA-20 feeds the country. It's time Washington noticed.
The Central Valley is an agricultural engine. Water policy, drought management, and energy investment are not abstract concerns here — they are the economic lifeblood of our communities.
Sandra will fight for sustainable, fair water policy that serves farmers, residents, and future generations. She believes the Central Valley's needs have been too long traded away in Sacramento and Washington backroom deals.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · electsandravanscotter.com/issues
Immigration is one of the most complicated policy challenges in America — and one of the most personal. CA-20 is home to farmworkers, veterans, mixed-status families, and multi-generational communities whose lives don't fit neatly into a political talking point.
Sandra supports immigration reform that is nuanced enough to reflect that reality, accountable to the rule of law, and human enough to recognize that the people at the center of this debate are exactly that — people.
She supports a pathway to legal status for undocumented workers who have built their lives and livelihoods here, similar to the amnesty passed under the Reagan administration. She believes border security and human dignity are not mutually exclusive. And she will never support policy that uses fear as a substitute for solutions.
CA-20's agricultural economy depends on immigrant labor. Any honest conversation about this district's future has to include the people who are already making it work.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · electsandravanscotter.com/issues
FEC filings, Oct 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00922666
89¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 5 reports ($42.4K of $47.7K). Cash on hand went from $448 on Mar 31, 2026 to $0 on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $8,201 | $7,753 | $448 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $3,965 | $2,012 | $1,953 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $4,920 | $6,937 | $0 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $24,083 | $17,477 | $6,606 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $6,570 | $8,250 | $0 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
17 endorsers listed on Sandra Van Scotter’s own campaign site: 6 parties, 1 official, 8 organizations, 2 people.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Former Mayor of Hanford
Educator & Community Leader, Bakersfield City School District School Board, School Board Trustee Area 3
Immigration, Community and Voting Activist
Advanced · 48,611 votes (29%) · 2 of 4 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 8 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 139 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $11.7K.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $47,739
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
100% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $11.7K of $11.7K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 139 contributions · 100% | $11,675 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 1 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 132 contributions · 85% of ranked | $9,930 |
| Written instead of an employer · 2 contributions · 6.5% of ranked | $755 |
| 2 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $285 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 2.1% of ranked | $250 |
| 1 contribution · 2% of ranked | $235 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 1.9% of ranked | $220 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($17,424) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 132 contributions · 85% of ranked | $9,930 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 2 contributions · 6.5% of ranked | $755 |
| 2 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $285 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1 contribution · 2.1% of ranked | $250 |
| 1 contribution · 2% of ranked | $235 |
| 1 contribution · 1.9% of ranked | $220 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($17,424) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
No outside spending filed
Total itemized disbursements $14,705
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 56 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 8.2% of all spending | $3,500 |
| 33 payments · 3.8% of all spending | $1,620 |
| 2 payments · 3.7% of all spending | $1,577 |
| 4 payments · 3.6% of all spending | $1,545 |
| 2 payments · 3.5% of all spending | $1,477 |
| 1 payment · 3.2% of all spending | $1,354 |
| 1 payment · 2.4% of all spending | $1,000 |
| 3 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $909 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.