Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CA-46 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, CA-46
Has not served in Congress
11 priorities from davidpan4congress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Rising crime is endangering our families and neighborhoods. To make our streets safe again, we need to recruit more police and enforce our laws.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · davidpan4congress.com/issues
Heading as listed on davidpan4congress.com ↗ (opens davidpan4congress.com at this heading)
Our schools are not always preparing our children to really advance in life. Parents should have the information they need to make decisions about their children’s education, and they should have access to all the educational options in their community. I support charter schools and school vouchers to allow all parents to choose the best education for their children.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · davidpan4congress.com/issues
Heading as listed on davidpan4congress.com ↗ (opens davidpan4congress.com at this heading)
Heading as listed on davidpan4congress.com ↗ (opens davidpan4congress.com at this heading)
Our open borders have allowed in drugs, criminals, and terrorists and prevented us from having a serious discussion about immigration. To regain control over our future, we need to secure our border so that we can develop a consistent immigration policy.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · davidpan4congress.com/issues
Small businesses struggle with high costs. Reducing taxes and regulations on small businesses will create jobs and renew our communities.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · davidpan4congress.com/issues
The United States has a debt problem. In 2000, our national debt was half of our GDP. Today it is twice that much and rising, primarily due to the steadily increasing costs of our welfare and entitlement programs. We cannot solve our debt problem without reforming those programs, and my plan to do this will save over $1 trillion per year, leading to long-term financial stability.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · davidpan4congress.com/issues
I am running for Congress because I want to change the way we relate to our government. My plan is to phase out all of our current welfare and entitlement programs and return this money (over $4 trillion per year) to the American people. Whether or not you agree with all the details of this plan, we need to engage in this discussion. The current system is unsustainable. You can find more details about my plan below.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · davidpan4congress.com/issues
As a professor for over 20 years, I have seen the deterioration of higher education. The irreproducibility crisis has undermined academic research, leading to false claims that have driven public policy in the wrong directions. The left-wing bias at colleges has become so extreme that few conservative professors remain, creating a form of groupthink that has suppressed real debate. We need to create new guidelines for government funding of higher education that demands more accountability from researchers and more diversity of perspectives.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · davidpan4congress.com/issues
In our current welfare programs, people lose benefits such as food stamps, Medicaid, and housing vouchers when they start to earn money on their own or begin to build up assets. This system discourages people from working and saving because working people receive few benefits. At the same time, the large bureaucracy is expensive and difficult to navigate. One of my main priorities will be to reduce this bureaucracy.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · davidpan4congress.com/issues
We all know that the Social Security Administration is headed for insolvency, but few politicians are willing to address the problem. Moreover, the current solutions on offer to either raise taxes or reduce benefits are not very appealing. My plan would guarantee existing benefits for everyone 37 and older, while introducing a sustainable system for the next generation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · davidpan4congress.com/issues
Healthcare costs in the U.S. have spiraled out of control, consuming 18% of our GDP, while no other country in the world spends more than 12%. The basic problem is that the people receiving health benefits have no incentive to consider the costs. This situation leads to the dominance in the healthcare sector of health insurance companies and government programs such as Medicaid and Medicare, rather than the doctors and nurses providing care. We need to bring back the centrality of the doctor-to-patient relationship, without the corporate and government bureaucracies getting in the way.
A first key reform would be to require all healthcare providers to post prices for their procedures. This transparency in pricing would give patients the information they need to make informed choices. In addition, it would eliminate the entire bureacracy that is required for haggling amongst insurance companies, government agencies, providers, and patients over each individual procedure.
A second key reform would be to require insurance providers to offer a high-deductible catastrophic insurance plan coupled with a health savings account that can be used to pay for routine care below the deductible. Such plans engage the recipients of care in decision-making that optimizes service and costs for their individual situations.
Finally, my plan to phase out the current welfare and entitlement system to create a universal basic income would pay $4000 per year into every individual American’s health savings account and allow each person to pay health insurance premiums from this account. We would have universal healthcare within a private system.
Medicaid and Medicare would be privatized, and people could still choose to remain in these programs by paying the monthly premiums.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · davidpan4congress.com/issues
I support a Constitutional amendment to prohibit government agencies from providing benefits to some people and not to others. With this change, we will take the wind out of the entire lobbying process. With no special benefits for the government to hand out, there would be no point to having lobbyists for special interests. Ordinary Americans would be in control of their government again.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · davidpan4congress.com/issues
-All welfare and entitlement programs would be phased out, and the money saved would be enough to provide $16,000 per year to every citizen 21 years of age and older. Of this money, $12,000 per year would be a direct deposit into bank accounts, and $4000 per year would be in the form of a health insurance voucher, to be used on the private market, thereby creating universal coverage in a totally private system.
-Those who are within 30 years of retirement may choose to stay with the existing system of Social Security and Medicare according to the current rules of those programs. These plans can stay solvent because there would be a new system for younger people, who would start to receive $16,000 per year right away, and this amount would not change thoughout their lives, though it could adjust for inflation.
-Medicaid and Medicare would be privatized and remain as options for people to choose as health care options alongside private plans. There would no longer be a special tax deduction for employer-sponsored health insurance. Instead, everyone would receive the $4000 per year health insurance voucher and could also choose to devote more money to purchasing more expensive plans. Such a system would create universal coverage with a maximum amount of competition amongst health care providers to provide the best coverage at the lowest cost.
-Existing programs such as SNAP and housing vouchers would be closed to new applicants. Current recipients could choose to either stay in these existing programs or begin receiving $16,000 per year in the new system, but not both. The existing welfare and entitlement programs would thereby be phased out gradually through attrition.
-While the details of such a plan can be up for debate, the basic premise is that people themselves will have a better idea of how best they can use their money than the government would.
-This plan is inspired by Charles Murray’s book, In Our Hands. Milton Friedman also argued for a similar plan in this lecture.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · davidpan4congress.com/issues
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00847699
$1.01 has been spent for every dollar raised across 9 reports ($105.2K of $104.1K). Cash on hand went from $2K on Mar 31, 2025 to $1.9K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $8,259 | $9,156 | $1,982 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $8,775 | $3,963 | $6,795 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $14,449 | $4,127 | $17,116 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $23,915 | $11,758 | $29,273 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $11,558 | $36,753 | $4,078 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $5,770 | $7,976 | $1,872 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $8,000 | $3,635 | $6,238 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $23,120 | $23,709 | $5,649 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $299 | $4,091 | $1,856 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
28 endorsers listed on David Pan’s own campaign site: 2 parties, 22 officials, 4 organizations.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Congressman
“David Pan stated, “From Day One of his administration, Congressman Ken Calvert has supported President Trump’s agenda to protect the citizens of the United States from enemies outside the United States. I am honored to have his endorsement in my race.” Ken Calvert noted, “David Pan has visited over 10,000 homes in the 46th district, and he has plans for ensuring public safety, lowering the cost of living, and providing parents with real choices for their children’s education. I am happy to endorse him for Congress.”
State Senator
State Senator
State Assembly member
State Assembly member
State Assembly member
Orange County Assessor
San Diego County Supervisor
Advanced · 38,993 votes (33%) · 2 of 5 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 103 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $64.8K.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
The 2 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 2 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $3K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $104,145
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
88% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $53.9K of $61.2K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 97 contributions · 88% | $53,903 |
| 1 contribution · 5.4% | $3,300 |
| 1 contribution · 4.1% | $2,500 |
| 1 contribution · 1.6% | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.8% | $500 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 5 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 17 contributions · 39% of ranked | $15,250 |
| 1 contribution · 8.5% of ranked | $3,300 |
| 1 contribution · 8.5% of ranked | $3,300 |
| 1 contribution · 7.7% of ranked | $3,000 |
| 1 contribution · 6.4% of ranked | $2,500 |
| Written instead of an employer · 5 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $1,500 |
| 4 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $1,100 |
| 1 contribution · 2.6% of ranked | $1,000 |
A further $25,800 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,583) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $250 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $79,801
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 84 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
14 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $20,903 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 20 payments · 29% of all spending | $30,342 |
| 19 payments · 14% of all spending | $15,000 |
| 2 payments · 14% of all spending | $14,850 |
| 4 payments · 9.1% of all spending | $9,600 |
| 1 payment · 3.1% of all spending | $3,300 |
| 1 payment · 1.9% of all spending | $2,000 |
| 1 payment · 1.6% of all spending | $1,633 |
| 1 payment · 0.9% of all spending | $900 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 47 contributions · 40% of ranked | $25,700 |
| 2 contributions · 9.8% of ranked | $6,300 |
| 2 contributions · 5.5% of ranked | $3,550 |
| 1 contribution · 5.4% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 5.1% of ranked | $3,300 |
| 1 contribution · 3.9% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 4 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $2,250 |
| 3 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $2,000 |
A further $500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,583) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.